How home-based childcare facilities support women’s workforce engagement in low-income areas of Dhaka city

“It would not be possible for me to join the workforce if I did not have anyone to care for my child. I can continue my work by keeping my child in a daycare facility. Otherwise, I would have to stay at home with no source of income,” said Nasima (pseudonym), a working mother from the Korail slum (one of the low-income areas in Dhaka city, where most of the residents live in small shacks with bamboo frames and crenelated tin roofs), about a home-based child care facility she uses for her children. There are many other women like Nasima in the slum whose participation in paid work is possible because of the existing home-based childcare support in the community. We interviewed some of them as part of the scoping research on the childcare business model for low-income families that BRAC is developing.

In Korail slum, women generally engage in paid work due to the stress of ensuring basic living conditions, as expenses are high and only one person’s income is not sufficient to meet household needs. The situation is even more difficult in a woman-headed household where the mother is the family’s sole earning member. Therefore, being able to do paid work is very important for most women from the research area to meet household needssuch as food and health careand provide for their children’s education. 

Working women with young children often have to depend on the support of other women and girls in the extended family, as childcare is generally considered to be a female responsibility. We found a mother from the research area, who is engaged with paid work, transferring her childcare responsibilities onto her ten-year-old daughter. She had to sacrifice her daughter’s education so that there was someone to look after the younger children while she worked to provide for her family. When there are no family members or relatives to take care of the child with the mother joining the workforce, they can (if they are fortunate) avail of home-based daycare facilities existing in that area. We found home-based daycare facilities run by the mothers and caregivers—who are referred to as khalas—of the areas. These community-based innovations usually emerge when a mother with a small child requests childcare support from other women in the neighborhood, generally in exchange for a small amount of money or in-kind benefits. Subsequently, earning opportunities are created for the women who work as caregivers. Sometimes the interdependence between the mothers and the caregivers forms a unique bond between the two women with trust working as a key factor. “I have known the caregiver for years. We live in the same house. She is like my mother. She takes good care of my daughter and treats her like her own granddaughter,” said Salma (pseudonym), a working mother of the area employed in a readymade garments factory. 

One of the most important requirements of the mothers from the research area is the safety of their children from physical harm and an assurance from the caregiver that the child will not go missing. Mothers also expect home-based daycare facilities to provide care and support for the children in their absence. 

Our observations during the field research showed that while these home-based childcare facilities responded to an immediate need, they did not adequately meet the children’s care needs and the safety concerns of their mothers. These home-based daycare facilities typically use the living space shared by the caregiver and her family. There is no dedicated space for the children and their cognitive development is not prioritized in home-based childcare facilities. These facilities also do not have basic services such as proper lighting, ventilation, separate toilets, and/or wash facilities for the children. They have no system to protect the children under their care from the risks of physical harm, such as from the cooking stove, open drainage, or sewerage lines near the places where they play. 

As they have to be far from their kids for a significant time and due to the unavailability of formal daycare centers within the neighbourhood, the working mothers in the community have to depend on these home-based daycare facilities despite the lack of a child-friendly environment. Working mothers are also generally not willing to make use of the rare formal daycare centers outside the community as the distance, high costs, mistrust in an unknown caregiver, and the fixed duration of keeping the children in the center, work as barriers. 

Identifying and considering the need for quality childcare services is necessary to make such local home-based childcare facilities more sustainable. Implementing the learnings and insights from these locally innovated home-based childcare facilities, BRAC aims to run a project to support caregivers and working mothers living in such neighbourhoods. Training will be provided to the caregivers under this project so that they can ensure quality childcare services. Educational and learning materials, such as books and toys, that can contribute to children’s cognitive development will also be provided. It can be expected that with external support, the caregivers of these local home-based facilities will be able to establish quality childcare centers with more advanced, child-friendly amenities. The caregivers will also be able to run their home-based daycare center as a social enterprise. 

It is important to consider the larger picture and the need for quality daycare as a national issue both for the children and the working mothers. The development of existing initiatives across the country to provide adequate childcare arrangements and support can enable women’s engagement in paid work while balancing their need for childcare in their absence. The government has a policy on daycares which should be updated and revised to take into account the changing needs of both urban and rural areas. Safe, secure, and child-friendly daycares are a right for children as well as working mothers.

How friendships build resilience to climate change

Rising salinity in Bangladesh’s coastal regions, increased heat stress, storm surges and flooding risks add to the already challenging baseline conditions of flooding and river erosion in the country. These changes, however, are not felt equally by all.

Climate change exacerbates the pre-existing inequalities of communities living in vulnerability. Communities relying on farming and already struggling with rising costs face income insecurity from erratic yields and prices. Ongoing struggles for fair wages and working conditions intensify with frequent heat waves and erratic rainfall. The impacts of the climate crisis thus occur within the long-standing dynamics wrought by the socioeconomic, historical and environmental inequities that play out within familiar power struggles.

A framework to measure resilience

Resilience of a community to climatic shocks is an important indicator of their vulnerability to climate change. Resilience captures a community’s capacity to recover from catastrophic occurrences and to adapt to changes over time. BRAC’s resilience framework breaks it down to four aspects: absorptive, anticipatory, adaptive and transformative capacities:

  • Absorptive capacity broadly deals with the ability to manage shocks associated with climate change. In general, physical assets, social capital and financial support form part of one’s absorptive capacity.
  • Anticipatory capacity comprises the ability to foresee and reduce climate-related shocks. It requires access to risk information and can be assessed through the level of awareness and understanding of possible risks. It is generally strengthened during non-emergency periods.
  • Adaptive capacity is the ability of a system to respond appropriately to the anticipation of risks, to avoid or minimise impacts of shocks.
  • Transformative capacity deals with structural issues such as gender discrimination. It is the capacity to make intentional change to stop or reduce the causes of risk, vulnerability, poverty and inequality, and ensure more equitable sharing of risk so it is not unfairly borne by people living in poverty or suffering from discrimination.

The first three capacities are well included in global conversations about adaptation, in the form of better predictive climate models, climate-resilient crops and other technological advances. The fourth capacity – transformative resilience – often gets overlooked. It is here where citizen participation, grassroots mobilisation and community strengthening play a key role.

We’re not all in the same boat, though

While resilience frameworks are helpful at a community level, structural issues put many groups at disproportionately higher risk than others in the same community. For example, mortality rates for women in disasters are higher than men. Women tend to have less ability to take quick and immediate measures for safety, such as running quickly or climbing a tree, due to clothing or social norms. Family members often attend to injured women after men. These structural issues feed into women’s absorptive capacity.

Women’s anticipatory capacity also gets affected by gender norms. Women tend to work inside, rather than outside the home, which increases their vulnerability through reduced access to risk information, including disaster warnings. Women have less access to information about climate change risks. Research conducted by BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD) in 2022 found that of the 33,554 women respondents surveyed across Bangladesh, 33% did not feel comfortable speaking about climate change.

Women’s relative lack of access to resources forms an important aspect of the disproportionate impact. These arise from a lack of access to paid employment and greater reliance on natural resources, which are associated with greater climate shocks and income volatility. Differential norms not only limit access to, but also authority over resources, as well as limiting involvement in decision-making processes.

Community support is integral in coping with disasters

BIGD’s ongoing research on poverty graduation programmes in Bangladesh shows that increasing women’s participation in decision-making strengthens their ability to respond to climate change. For example, in BRAC’s Ultra-Poor Graduation programme, participants meet regularly weekly with other participants. This improves response networks and enhances awareness and chances of receiving assistance during crises.

Shima Rani Das leading a women’s trauma counselling session in Khulna, where the climate crisis has been destroying livelihoods for decades. © BRAC 2013.

Strong community bonds also help to cope with slow onset climate change impacts, by increasing the number of individuals whom a person can seek support from. A support network can also help households absorb shocks effectively through sharing risks. The programme ensures technical knowledge is easily disseminated and understood, and regular meetings with other participants ensures risk awareness and technical training around adaptive enterprises are well absorbed by the group. All of these contribute to building transformative resilience.

Insights for the world

As we plan adaptation measures, we need to factor in building resilience in all of its forms, particularly ensuring we include measures to build transformative resilience to overcome structural inequalities. Something as simple as having a strong network of neighbours, peers, and friends – particularly for women – can be the difference between life and death in a natural disaster.

Rohini Kamal is a Research Fellow leading the Environment and Climate Change research at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), BRAC University.

Time for ground-up climate policy

The disappointment of many with COP26 is understandable. Yet again, historical carbon emitters failed to extend the requisite support to countries most impacted by climate change. The deep injustice in the matter is palpable, especially as these countries have contributed the least to the problem at hand.

Thus, countries like Bangladesh – one of the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change – are strengthening its leadership role among the countries affected, through platforms like the Climate Vulnerable Forum, consisting of 55 developing countries.

Last year’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 6th Assessment Report published the latest findings on the physical science aspect of climate change. This year, we look forward to the report on its impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation. Furthermore, this year’s COP27, to be held in Egypt in November, is expected to focus more on the questions of adaptation, resilience, loss and damage.

Thus, for many countries already impacted by climate change, this year holds some promise to redress last year’s disappointment.

Successful adaptation to climate change crucially depends on a keen awareness of the risks – and the ability to respond to the risks appropriately – to safeguard populations living in vulnerability.

This is especially true for community-led adaptation initiatives, which are becoming increasingly important. However, awareness about specific risks from climate change may vary across communities, owing to the lack of equal access to information.

BRAC Institute of Governance and Development conducted the largest study on perceived climate risks in Bangladesh, using a dataset of 33,554 nationally representative households across 64 districts, from the baseline survey for BRAC’s Strategic Partnership Agreement in 2017.

To our knowledge, this is one of the largest assessments in the world on the perceived or felt impacts of climate change and environmental variations.

Agriculture for Development: Purchase the special issue here

The study establishes whether the changes listed by IPCC, the national documents, and respondents in the survey differ from one another. Further, it assesses whether respondents from districts identified to be vulnerable to specific variations report greater such variations, compared to the variations reported by the respondents from other districts.

Findings show that a significant proportion of respondents perceived changes in some climatic variables that were identified by the IPCC. A greater proportion of respondents from vulnerable districts perceived increased risk.

However, there is a weaker perception – or awareness – of the changes happening in other areas, like riverbank erosion and regional reduction in precipitation, suggesting that these hazards are not well communicated to communities at risk.

Additionally, certain perceived changes reported by the respondents have not been included in policy reports, indicating the need for the mechanism to better incorporate people’s experiences into policy.

As climate impacts are often indistinguishable from the risks arising from localised human activities and environmental degradation, our results call for a more nuanced analysis of how risks associated with climate change interact with those arising from natural hazards and social and economic issues.

Overall, there is a strong need for ground-up, evidence-based experience to inform policy.

By generating rigorous, multidisciplinary field research on environment and climate change, we wish to understand the complex lived realities of the communities affected.

This reality was captured, perhaps most powerfully, in the work of Hugh Brammer in Bangladesh. Since 1961, he has had a deep commitment to the country, and leaves behind a rich legacy. The proceeds from his book, ‘BRAC’s innovative contributions to agricultural development in Bangladesh and elsewhere’, continue going to BRAC as scholarships to students living in disadvantaged conditions.

Through his vast contributions in soil science, agriculture, land use, and later climate change, two consistent themes emerge: first, a commitment to learning from farmers and communities; and second, a full acknowledgement of the complexities, even if they upend long-held assumptions and go against popular knowledge.

It is in this spirit that this special issue of Ag4Dev, co-edited with International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD), includes, in addition to the study, papers on land-use, food security, and climate change in Bangladesh; the role of computer-generated predictive soil mapping; and on policy implications of arsenic poisoning.

We felt it is important to share Hugh Brammer’s work as well as his research ethos, and to project forward what it means for current challenges facing the world.

In that dialectic between doing and learning, learning and doing lies the key in identifying solutions that would work for the climate change challenge. Combining action and research means that doers have to also be our teachers. People whose lives and livelihoods are most tied to the elements, to the soil and water and the climate, can teach us best about what will work on ground.

The dynamics of interaction between climate change and underlying environmental and socio-economic trends are often not clear-cut. Through our exploration of Hugh’s research we learn to place the climate change action agenda within the underlying socio-economic realities faced by people in their everyday lives.

I invite people to read the journal and think of the challenges of bridging research and practice. How can we push for policies that accommodate the complexities of the real world, and accommodate local knowledge, especially from indigenous and farming communities?

The Environment and Climate Change research stream at the BRAC Institute of Governance and Development serves to illuminate how economic, environmental, and climate change together impact livelihood, vulnerability and migration, by applying data-driven research and rigorous impact evaluations of scalable, low-cost interventions in the field of climate change and environment.

Rohini Kamal is a Research Fellow leading the Environment and Climate Change cluster at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), BRAC University.