BIGD’s WEE-DiFine Initiative launches a funding call dedicated to small grants

Following the success of the first request for proposals, BIGD’s Women’s Economic Empowerment and Digital Finance (WEE-DiFine) Initiative has launched a call dedicated to pilot, measurement, and qualitative studies, with small grants of up to USD 50,000 available.

Why pilot, measurement, and qualitative studies?

Pilot studies allow researchers to evaluate a program on a smaller scale to explore the feasibility of an intervention and to identify challenges that might emerge on a pathway to scale. Pilot studies also provide preliminary data which can be leveraged to raise funding to scale promising opportunities.

Rigorously measuring women’s economic empowerment can be a complex and multifaceted process. Conducting measurement studies through field surveys in the context of DFS and WEE can serve as an effective way to develop novel measurement techniques or adapt existing measures for different cultural contexts or populations.

High-quality, rigorous qualitative research can be used to disentangle the causal mechanisms of an RCT or shed light on specific themes to inform the Initiative’s research agenda. The Initiative will consider two kinds of qualitative studies to foster evidence in this space. Research teams can seek WEE-DiFine funding to 1) advance high-quality, mixed-method research by adding expertly designed qualitative research methods to existing projects, or 2) conduct standalone pre-pilot qualitative research that may influence subsequent studies exploring the pathways between DFS and WEE.

Request for Proposals

Researchers interested in submitting a proposal are encouraged to review the Small Grants RFP, the associated white paper, and the budgetary guidelines. The deadline for proposal submissions is May 31, 2021.

Impact of COVID-19 on RMG Sector: The False Narrative

Photo: Marcel Crozet / ILO

The ready-made garments (RMG) sector is by far the most important contributor to the economy of the country, amounting to 15 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) and employing nearly four million people. There is no denying that the main driving force behind the RMG sector is the vast quantity of workers that it employs. However, these workers have, over the years, emerged as a critically marginalized and vulnerable group. They have faced the brunt of the factory authorities’ negligence towards their safety and security, as evident by the Rana Plaza incident in 2013. In the past year, the COVID-19 pandemic has once again exposed the vulnerabilities of the RMG workers and how their safety concerns, demands, and livelihood have been threatened by the indecisions of not only the government, but the apex owners’ associations, Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) and Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA), regarding when to close or reopen the factories, and also about their wages.

Since the beginning of March 2020 when the COVID-19 threat became ever so real in Bangladesh labour leaders have been demanding the closure of factories in an attempt to protect the workers from being infected by the deadly virus. In the initial stages, the government showed great reluctance towards factory closures stating that workers’ safety will be taken into consideration. While safety inside of the factories or while entering the factories were targets of intense debate among labour leaders, the government, and the owners’ association, safety and sanitation outside of the factories were mentioned only in passing. There was a clear lack of initiatives or guidelines being implemented to ensure that workers were not contracting the virus outside of the factories. 

As the situation in the country worsened, BGMEA began contemplating the closure of factories which it later backtracked on due to backlash from various factory owners. Therefore, it did not come as a surprise that workers began to demonstrate demanding closure of factories as the viral outbreak spread, causing fears of infection and death. When the “general holidays” were declared, then extended, the workers’ safety was yet again at the bottom of the priority list: the government was criticized for its dual policies by allowing the closure of offices and transportation to be continued while factories were to be opened. As the workers clamoured to return to their workplaces because they were threatened with job cuts, they were subjected to some of the harshest conditions, not to mention the extreme levels of exposure to the virus. Some workers, for instance, had to walk from Mymensingh to join their place of work in Dhaka, because public transport services were shut down during the pandemic. 

In my review of various newspapers from February 2020 to February 2021, I observed a significant lack of concern for the wellbeing of the RMG workers. For years the struggle for decent wages and other workers’ rights have been at the forefront of the demands set by labour leaders, and during the pandemic, this struggle is ever more prevalent. In June 2020 alone, there were reports of 100 cases of labour unrest pertaining to payment of wages. In an attempt to allow relief for the factories that had order cancellations, suspensions, or no orders at all, wages were cut to just 65 per cent for workers who could not join their work because of the pandemic, after a tripartite meeting with labour leaders, government officials, and factory owners’ associations.

At the same time, news of order cancellations began to pour into the newspapers and dominated the mainstream media and official narrative. It has often been highlighted that the local manufacturers are looking at USD 3.18 billion work order cancellation or suspension as a result of the pandemic, and this is has been one of the most frequent narratives to be promoted, even while reporting of RMG workers’ protests for their wages, arrears, bonuses, or layoffs. In contrast, when the report was published stating that Bangladesh’s RMG workers had lost approximately USD 501 million or 29.5 per cent of their monthly wages from March to May 2020, the immediate reactions were to either deny these results or shift the blame from the factory authorities to the buyers. 

Where most of the reporting on RMG labour unrest falls short on is the greater socioeconomic impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had and will have on the workers specifically, in a way that will shed a clear light on the reasons behind their protests, demonstrations, and cry for help. Even as reports emerged that one million RMG workers were laid off due to the raging pandemic, industry leaders have been very quick to dismiss such findings as being baseless. What this does is add fuel to the fire and the easiest scapegoats are the protesting workers.


Subaita Fairooz completed her internship at the Gender and Social Transformation Cluster at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), BRAC University.

International Recognition of Dr Saleemul Huq and the Imperative for Establishing the Voice of the Global South in Climate Science

Dr Saleemul Huq, Director, International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD)

This year on Earth Day, 20 April 2021, Reuters duly recognized Dr Saleemul Huq as one of the world’s leading climate change scientists. It is a moment of great pride to see Bangladesh, a Bangladeshi Institution—International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD)—and a Bangladeshi scientist on the Reuters Hot List, which identified and ranked the world’s most influential climate scientists. 

The prestigious list identified the climate scientists from a comprehensive database of scientific publications on climate change and ranked the scientists based on the number of climate change research papers published and cited within similar academic disciplines, as well as the public outreach of their work, for example, coverage in press, social media, and policy papers. 

The ranking recognizes Dr Huq’s relentless effort in propelling Bangladesh as a crucial contributor to the global knowledge around climate change. It is not desirable that vulnerable countries in the Global South merely serve as a site from which academics in developed countries extract knowledge. For bringing effective, long-lasting, and real change, the Global South must contribute to the scientific knowledge, most importantly around climate change adaptation, which requires a deep understanding of the local context. As one of the countries most vulnerable to climate change, Bangladesh has already seen how climate risks play out in reality and how these risks interact with the specific geographic, climatic, and sociocultural contexts. Bangladeshi scientists, using these lived experiences and context knowledge, have generated innovative solutions that work. 

It is essential that countries in the Global South, particularly those vulnerable to climate change, lead the way in generating scientific knowledge through research institutes like ICCCAD and knowledge-sharing platforms like Gobeshona. In global policy and leadership, Bangladesh has been playing an ever-prominent role through the Climate Vulnerable Forum and Global Center on AdaptationOn Bangladesh’s 50th anniversary, the recognition of Dr Huq’s work shows that we are well poised to take on this challenge. But perhaps even more pertinently, his work gives voice to the communities experiencing the impacts, not just academic researchers. 

As we look to the next 50 years, the research community in Bangladesh should actively learn from and make space for impacted communities to share their knowledge to an even greater degree. Dr Huq’s work goes beyond the academic and policy realm to include impacted communities as well as the practitioners in governmental and non-governmental institutions, who have mass outreach through working directly with marginalized communities. The last decade has seen the proliferation of research on community-led adaptation and efforts to bring in practitioners and policy makers to this mix. The nature of climate change necessitates such plurality of thought and diversity in our approach through local-led solutions. For example, mainstreaming climate change into operations of institutions such as BRAC has the potential to reach millions through its programs. 

His work will guide Bangladeshi social science researchers like us to consciously co-create knowledge for action in climate research and inspire institutions like BIGD to pursue climate change research focused on identifying solutions to scaling up policy interventions and development programs that work. 

As we celebrate Dr Huq’s achievement, it is my hope that we follow his lead and keep in mind the knowledge generation must be dialectical, not just between the developed nations and the Global South but between academics and communities most impacted by climate change.


Dr Rohini Kamal is a Research Fellow leading the Environment and Climate Change cluster at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), BRAC University.