Poverty, Aspiration, and Capability

Poverty, Aspiration, and Capability: Looking into the Future

A child often dreams big, despite its circumstances, blissful and naive. That is why when we ask a poor child what it wants to be in life, we often get somewhat audacious answers like a pilot, a doctor, or a teacher. But as the child grows, the cruel nails of reality start puncturing the balloons of its aspirations.

Children adjust their aspirations based on their lives’ experience, continuously and subconsciously. Particularly, children’s aspirations are shaped by internalising the experience of people around them—their parents, siblings, extended family, and community. But usually, the people in a poor child’s life are also poor, with limited education, wealth, and social status.

A poor child “belongs” to a disadvantaged community, not just physically, but also in an abstract sense. It belongs to a socio-economic class and racial or cultural identities that also tend to be disadvantaged. Belonging to one class or identity also comes with the feeling of exclusion from others. The feeling comes through direct experience—for example, the knowledge that it is extremely unlikely for someone from the extreme-poor class to become a part of the educated, urban class. Or it comes through the stigma or notion attached to the class or identity—for example, the widespread belief that an extreme-poor person is “incapable” of becoming a part of an educated, urban class.

Growing up, a child eventually anchors its aspirations to its life experience as well as to the belongingness to and exclusion from certain groups and identities. In other words, aspirations are adjusted to their perceived realm of feasibility. For the poor and disadvantaged, this realm is limited and thus, their aspirations tend to be low.

But do aspirations really matter?

Aspiration is defined as “a hope or ambition of achieving something.” It is closely related to explicit or subconscious goal setting, which can affect performance in many ways. First, goals can direct attention and effort towards goal-related behaviours and actions and away from those that are irrelevant, including what is outside the perceived realm of feasibility. For example, a poor father may not invest in his child’s education if he does not aspire his child to find high-skill jobs. Second, goals serve an energising function—harder goals producing higher levels of effort and easier goals producing lower effort. If perceived return to education is low, why would the poor set lofty goals for education and work hard to attain them? Finally, goals also motivate people to learn skills and acquire the capabilities necessary to achieve those goals. For example, a poor adolescent may not take her lessons seriously, if she does not aspire to use her education for earning.
While it is often clear how low aspiration and low effort keep people poor, the opposite causal link—poverty breeding low aspiration and effort—is neither observable nor intuitive. But we realise by now, low aspiration can simultaneously be a cause and effect of poverty—poor people aspiring low and low aspiration producing behaviour that helps perpetuate poverty, creating a behavioural poverty trap.

Addressing poverty is the number one global development agenda, but actions to this end often fail for incomprehensible reasons. Subsidised skills training programs targeted to the poor usually have low take-up rates and disappointing learning outcomes; microcredit is frequently splurged on consumption goods, not invested in the productive asset; promotion on healthy behaviour seldom brings sustainable change.

Can aspiration help explain these failures? If so, is it possible to break the behavioural poverty trap through external influence?

Research suggests that role models can play an influential role in raising a person’s aspiration, particularly when the person belongs to the class or identity of the role model. A randomized control trial (RCT) found that when women are appointed in village councils in India, the gender gap in occupational aspiration and educational attainment among adolescents in those villages disappears—the adolescent girls find a relatable role model in the female leader. There are also indications that depiction of strong female characters on television (TV) shows can influence gender-norms—ideas about what women can and cannot do.

Is it possible to introduce relatable, successful role models to the poor through documentary films that would influence the aspirations and behaviours of the poor and help them break free of the behavioural poverty trap?

Economist Stefan Dercon, along with other researchers, conducted an experiment in a distant corner in Ethiopia, with some of the poorest and marginal communities in the country. They showed a one-hour documentary on successful people from similar communities to a randomly selected group of poor people. Six months after showing the documentary, they found an improvement in aspirations among those exposed to the success stories. It also had a positive effect on their savings and credit behaviour, children’s school enrolment, and investments in children’s schooling.

The experiment provides two important insights: 1) it is possible to alter the aspirations of the poor people through a relatively simple mechanism, such as a documentary; and 2) change in aspiration can bring positive changes in the behaviour of the poor, potentially helping them get out of the behavioural poverty trap.

The authors have conducted a follow-up survey in Ethiopia after five years to test the long-term impact of the documentary. Stefan Dercon, et al. are testing a similar intervention with the clients of an organisation called Give Directly that provides direct cash support to the poorest. They are exploring whether watching documentaries on a relatable role model can increase the impact of cash transfer. The result of these experiments can provide us with valuable insights on developing more effective poverty reduction programs, through incorporating efficient strategies to address the barrier of low aspiration.

Improving aspiration by itself may not do much, but it has the potential to boost the impact of development programs, accelerating the rate of poverty reduction and improving socio-economic mobility. For us, it would be very interesting to test whether aspirations play a role in improving the effectiveness of ultra-poor graduation or skill development program, for example.

Nusrat Jahan is the Head of Communications and Knowledge Management at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University.  

Wide Gender Gap

Wide Gender Gap in Freedom of Choice Among the Bangladeshi Youth

In 2018, BIGD and BRAC conducted a nationwide youth survey, where young people across the country were interviewed about different dimensions of their lives. One of the dimensions was freedom of choice.

Freedom of choice is a basic human right. It is closely related to the sense of agency, which “refers to the subjective experience of controlling one’s action, and, through them, external events.”1 So, the lack of freedom of choice may be detrimental to individual agency. Research has found that when people are not given a choice, they may lose their agency, not only in essence but also in action.

That’s why we were interested in the perceived freedom of choice of the youth. We asked them to rate their freedom of choice in some critical areas as very low/low/high/very high. Overall, 70-80% of youth reported enjoying a high and very high level of freedom in case of selecting an educational institute, occupation, and friends. Fewer youth enjoy high or very high levels of freedom in terms of physical movement and spending money. The lowest level of freedom is reported on selecting a spouse. These findings are not unexpected.

But we also found large differences in the level of freedom enjoyed by the female and male youth in all aspects of freedom. In the case of freedom to choose their occupation, this difference is 30% and in the case of spending money, it is more than 25%. We see the starkest difference in case of physical mobility. Percentage of women enjoying a high or very high level of freedom of physical mobility is less than half the freedom that male youth enjoy, 40% vs 83%.

We created an index of freedom of choice* by combining the responses on each type of freedom. The following figure shows the percentage of youth who scored high in the freedom of choice index by their education. We see two things. First, young women’s perceived freedom of choice is strongly correlated with their level of education—freedom of choice improves with education. Second, in each cohort, the difference between male and female youth is still very high though the difference seems to somewhat narrow with higher education.

Overall, only 10% of male youth had low freedom of choice index whereas the rate is 45% for female youth.

*This variable has been constructed by summing up the variables indicating freedom of the youth. For example, educational institution selection, friend selection, freedom of movement, spending money, spouse selection, and occupation selection. If the value is 5 and 6, it indicates “Higher freedom.” Accordingly, if it is 0, 1, and 2 then “Low /No freedom”

We also find that rural young women reported having lower freedom of choice in every aspect compared to their urban counterpart. Only a third of the rural young women mentioned enjoying the freedom of physical movement, spending money, and spouse selection. These rates are much higher for urban young women.

We tried to identify whether freedom of choice varies with the socio-economic background across three aspects—freedom of movement, freedom to spend money, and freedom to select an occupation. We find that freedom of choice is quite consistent and high for young men across socio-economic classes. But women from lower socio-economic classes enjoy the least amount of freedom in all three aspects. With improving socio-economic status, more female youth reported enjoying these rights. But even among the richest young women, perceived freedom of choice is lower than that of young men from any socio-economic class. Again, we can see the starkest difference in physical movement.

All these findings indicate to the sticky nature of gender norms.

We do see, though, that young women who are engaged in economic activities are more likely to feel freer than those who are not, particularly in physical movement, spending money, and friends and occupation selection.

But, in our survey, we also found that the participation of young women in economic activities is very low compared to men. Forty-five per cent of the women are neither studying not earning. The rate is just 5% among young men. The vast majority of young women not pursuing higher studies are getting married and dropping out of the labour market. Economic activity among young women with higher education drastically improves, albeit much lower than the rates among young men with any level of education. But only 4% of young women study beyond higher-secondary, half the rate of male youth. Female youth are also much less confident about their English language and computer skills, the two most important competencies demanded by modern-day jobs. So, it is not just freedom of choice, young women in Bangladesh are falling far behind in most important aspects of life, particularly those related to their participation in the economy.

This is precisely why the lack of physical mobility for young women is of grave concern. Being able to move freely is a precondition for women to access education, training, social network, and employment. It is the way of achieving economic empowerment, a stepping stone for young women to gain social empowerment, including freedom of choice. And mobility is exactly where young women in Bangladesh are struggling the most.


Nusrat Jahan is the Head of Communications and Knowledge Management at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University.

1Emilie A. Caspar et al., “Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain,” Current Biology 26, no. 5 (March 7, 2016): 585–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067.

Making Room at the Table

Making Room at the Table: Addressing the Limitations of Women’s Economic Participation

The lively and vibrant Gender and Social Transformation (GST) cluster at BIGD today owes much of its success to the iron-willed woman Simeen Mahmud. A pioneering researcher in her own right, she was the co-founder and coordinator of the cluster. Her death has left a hole in the hearts of many of our colleagues who spent years working together with her. To commemorate the memory of Simeen Mahmud, the GST cluster of BIGD began the year 2020 by organising an international conference titled “Knowledge, Power and Social Change.”

It was a multi-session conference. The second session titled “Gender and Labour Markets: Negotiating Structures of Constraint” explored the role of women within the labour market of Bangladesh. With the support of scholars such as Dr Martha Chen, Dr Nazneen Ahmed, Prof Sayema Haque Bidisha, and Prof Naila Kabeer who collaborated with Simeen Mahmud, it unpacked the reasons as to why women’s participation in Bangladesh’s labour market is still considerably low.

The first presentation of this session was titled “Women and Men in Informal Employment: Bangladesh in Comparative Perspective” in which Dr Martha Chen addressed the limitations to women’s empowerment. These included inaccessibility to factors of production, troublesome relationships, and dominating power dynamics. She argued that these factors restrict the progress of women’s work, empowerment, and agency.

The second presentation was on “Why do Ready-made Garments Workers Leave Their Job Early: Aspirations of Current Workers and Experience of Former Workers.” In this presentation, Dr Nazneen Ahmed explored the reasons why women leave the ready-made garments (RMG) industry. The reasons she identified included forced retirement, violence/harassment, workplace injuries, work-related stress, and family-related problems. Alarming was the prevalence of the negative connotation associated with women working in a garment factory.

Adding to the narrative, in her presentation titled “Structural Transformation and Female Empowerment in Bangladesh,” Prof Sayema Haque Bidisha encouraged women to enter industries that are less agricultural in nature. However, she acknowledged that the pace of such transformation is slow and questionable. Lack of education and training, marriage, and children restrict women from entering the labour market. She also added that gender discrimination is so ingrained into the nation that it requires mass-energy to dismantle long-established structures of patriarchy and systemic oppression.

The last presentation was made by Prof Naila Kabeer on “Gender and Labour Market Segmentation in Bangladesh: A Mixed-method Approach.” She discussed why women in Bangladesh are still dominantly in home-based self-employment. According to her, this is due to limited choice, dominance of marriage as a social norm, landlessness, and illiteracy. Women’s subscription to traditional norms, i.e. wearing a burqa or hijab, reflects on their ability to work outside the home. Autonomy and recognition of women participation, she argued, has been under constant scrutiny and require major improvements.

The conference not only honoured the cherished memories of Simeen Mahmud but it, particularly the second session, also provided an insight into her work. During her lifetime, Simeen Mahmud performed extensive fieldwork to observe and record the daily life and work of men and women using various methods. She explored the norms and standards that give shape to the choices and constraints of women and their ability to participate in the labour market. These lines of inquiry, however, had been cut short after she passed away.

The conference was an inspiration for us—we who aspire to produce quality academic knowledge that will improve people’s lives—to continuously develop the areas of work Simeen Mahmud devoted her life to.


Samia Kalim Syed is an intern in the Gender and Social Transformation cluster at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University. 

The State of Education in Urban Slums of Bangladesh

The State of Education in Urban Slums of Bangladesh

Nazmeen (17), a mother of an 8-month old child, works at three different apartments in Mohammadpur as a housemaid. Married off at the tender age of 15, she had never completed her schooling and had to take on the heavy burden of motherhood, even before she herself could grow up. Although the odds were against her, Kohinoor was determined to protect her daughter from suffering the same fate as hers.

Nazmeen’s story is, unfortunately, not unique—thousands of young adolescents living in urban slums across Bangladesh share her fate. Slum households have a primary school enrolment rate of only 77.2%—significantly lower than the national level statistics of 97.7%. This indicates that the financial vulnerability of slum households translates to low enrolment.

Data taken from “Socio-Economics of Slum Dwellers: A Situation Analysis” by Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC

According to a baseline study conducted by the Research and Evaluation Division of BRAC, enrolment numbers suffer a drastic drop as the age group of the children in consideration increases—from 69% (for 10-14 years old) to 25% (for 15 and 19 years old), indicating alarmingly high dropout rates among school-going adolescents in the urban slums.

Data taken from “Socio-Economics of Slum Dwellers: A Situation Analysis” by Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC

Among numerous reasons contributing to this high rate of dropout, one of the noteworthy reasons is early marriage. Research findings show a strong negative correlation between child marriage among the adolescents aged 15-19 years and their school enrolment rate. This tells us that child marriage can be the reason for school dropout, and school dropout might be the reason for getting married before the age of 18. Providing basic education and some level of vocational training for entering the labour force may act as a deterrent for the incidence of child marriages in urban slums.

Frequent migration may also be contributing to higher dropout among children and adolescents. This is evident from the fact that school enrollment rate at the primary level is around 85% for the households that are living in current slums for more than 6 years, while the corresponding rate is 68% among those that are living for less than a year in the current slum.

Data taken from “Socio-Economics of Slum Dwellers: A Situation Analysis” by Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC

Zarine Anan Khondoker is a Communications Officer at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University. 

Engaging Rural Bangladeshi

Engaging Rural Bangladeshi Women to Monitor Public Procurement

Every year, Bangladesh spends around $24 billion – half of its annual budget – on the acquisition of goods, services, and works by the government and state enterprises. Of this, the implementation of development programs accounts for $18 billion. Public procurement is closely tied to national development, and monitoring it is crucial to ensure that development goals are met.

Engaging communities to do so, however, can be a challenging task. Engaging women, even more so.
Over the last few years, Bangladesh has piloted citizen’s engagement for monitoring procurement contracts in rural areas. Female participation in procurement site meetings was, on average, 30 percent. Under the Digitizing Implementation Monitoring and Public Procurement Project (DIMAPPP), the Bangladesh government collaborated with our Citizen Engagement team, and we set out to find some answers in Sylhet division.

Local women were asked whether they were interested in monitoring the construction work of roads and schools. Initial responses were positive, along with the affirmation that they wanted to exercise their rights as citizens and contribute to ensuring better quality work.

Procurement or construction work is mostly perceived as “men’s work,” more so in the rural areas. Women’s participation in this sector, as tenderers, is minimal.

But, as we dug deeper, multiple reasons surfaced as to why this enthusiasm does not translate into active participation.

For starters, procurement or construction work is mostly perceived as “men’s work,” more so in the rural areas. Women’s participation in this sector, as tenderers, is minimal. Those who participate, are assumed to involve their male colleagues in the process.

Consequently, men became the dominant actors in the procurement sector. This apparent absence of women affects our field research, when we try to engage female citizens in monitoring public procurement work.
“A man understands better than a woman about construction work,” said one respondent. This seemed to be a widely-held perception.

Social structure also deters women’s participation in monitoring public procurement. In Bangladesh, women often bear the heavier workload with little to no help at home. Thus, it becomes burdensome for women to monitor a site, in addition to their household chores.

Mobility is another issue since rural women do not go out as much as men do. While it is easier for men to monitor construction on the way to their work or social gatherings, women need to take time out especially for monitoring.
Procurement or construction work is mostly perceived as “men’s work,” more so in rural areas, in line with current social norms.

In some instances, we observed some hesitation among women to hold men accountable. The problem surfaced when we asked women what they would do after detecting irregularities in procurement work.

One simply said that she would rather delegate it to her husband as she thinks, “it is better that men deal with men.” In other cases, there were permissions needed. In one case, we heard that women were barred from attending a site meeting organized in front of a mosque.

All these factors lead to absence or passive participation of women in site meetings and monitoring work, even when the entire program design and implementation team aims to assist women to participate.

However, despite these challenges, women are developing their own creative solutions and strategies to circumvent such hindrances. Uncomfortable to visit sites alone, women suggested that they monitor in groups and by taking turns.

As for speaking to unknown men, they believe forming a group will make their voices stronger. In some cases, although very few, vocal women are being proactive and leading efforts to organize fellow women to monitor.
With the project scaling up from 16 to 48 Upazilas (sub-district) next year, the team will take account of both obstacles and local solutions to ensure greater female participation.


Erina Mahmud was a Research Associate in the Governance and Politics cluster at BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University. 

The article was first published on The World Bank’s End Poverty in South Asia Blog.